<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clearing of head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jmblog.com/2008/01/12/clearing-of-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2008/01/12/clearing-of-head/</link>
	<description>JMBlog - the web journal of Jere Matlock.  Fresh viewpoints on a wide range of subjects.  Opinions, essays, observations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:47:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owner</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2008/01/12/clearing-of-head/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/2008/01/12/clearing-of-head/#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  I set it to &quot;bracket&quot; the automatic exposure, so the first photo takes a picture at what the camera thinks is the right exposure, then one that is slightly underexposed according to its calculations, then one that is slightly over-exposed.  So it does a lot of the work for me.  I used to do this routinely with my old Pentax ME Super (a 35-mm film camera from the early 1980&#039;s.)

With the &quot;anti-shake&quot; feature of the camera, it seems to take crisper, clearer photos, too--less shaking of the hands during the exposure, just as advertised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  I set it to &#8220;bracket&#8221; the automatic exposure, so the first photo takes a picture at what the camera thinks is the right exposure, then one that is slightly underexposed according to its calculations, then one that is slightly over-exposed.  So it does a lot of the work for me.  I used to do this routinely with my old Pentax ME Super (a 35-mm film camera from the early 1980&#8242;s.)</p>
<p>With the &#8220;anti-shake&#8221; feature of the camera, it seems to take crisper, clearer photos, too&#8211;less shaking of the hands during the exposure, just as advertised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desi</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2008/01/12/clearing-of-head/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Desi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/2008/01/12/clearing-of-head/#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Ooh, pretty pictures, dad. The new camera works really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, pretty pictures, dad. The new camera works really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
